Wulff, D. U., Hills, T. T., & Mata, R. (2022). Structural differences in the semantic networks of younger and older adults. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 21459 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11698-4

Wulff, D. U., & Mata, R. (2022). On the semantic representation of risk. Science Advances, 8(27), Article eabm1883. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm1883

Zacharopoulos, G., Hertz, U., Kanai, R., & Bahrami, B. (2022). The effect of feedback valence and source on perception and metacognition: An fMRI investigation. Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2020.1828323

Zilker, V. (2022). Stronger attentional biases can be linked to higher reward rate in preferential choice. Cognition, 225, Article 105095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105095

Zilker, V. (2022). Choice rules can affect the informativeness of model comparisons. Computational Brain & Behavior, 5, 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-022-00142-5

Zilker, V., & Pachur, T. (2022). Nonlinear probability weighting can reflect attentional biases in sequential sampling. Psychological Review, 129(5), 949–975. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000304

Zilker, V., & Pachur, T. (2022). Toward an attentional turn in research on risky choice. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 953008. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.953008

Scolobig, A., Potter, S., Kox, T., Kaltenberger, R., Weyrich, P., Chasco, J., Golding, B., Hilderbrand, D., Fleischhut, N., Uprety, D., & Rana, B. (2022). Connecting warning with decision and action: A partnership of communicators and users. In B. Golding (Ed.), Towards the “perfect” weather warning: Bridging disciplinary gaps through partnership and communication (pp. 47–85). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98989-7_3

Wegwarth, O. (2022). Die COVID-Pandemie: Transparente Kommunikation von Risiken und Unsicherheiten in Pandemiezeiten. In U. Stößel, G. Reschauer, & M. Michaelis (Eds.), 35. Freiburger Symposium "Arbeitsmedizin im Gesundheitsdienst": 15.-17. September 2021 (pp. 22–32). edition FFAS.

Bolenz, F., & Pachur, T. (2022). Exploring the structure of predecisional information search in risky choice. In J. Culbertson, A. Perfors, H. Rabagliati, & V. Ramenzoni (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 44, pp. 2297–2302). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4fx494f9.

Fuławka, K., & Pachur, T. (2022). An affective probability weighting function for risky choice with nonmonetary outcomes. In J. Culbertson, A. Perfors, H. Rabagliati, & V. Ramenzoni (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 44, pp. 1025–1032). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5bg7f816.

Hecht, M., Pachur, T., & Schulze, C. (2022). Does social sampling differ between online and offline contacts? A computational modeling analysis. In J. Culbertson, A. Perfors, H. Rabagliati, & V. Ramenzoni (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 44, pp. 319–325). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0c161487.

Holford, D., Jenny, M. A., Hahn, U., Koylyu, A., Scherzer, M., Lewandowsky, S., Herzog, S., Fasce, A., & Wulf, M. (2022). COVID-19: Communication of public health information. [Written evidence submitted by SciBeh for the Scottish Government’s] COVID-19 Recovery Committee, 15th Meeting, 2022 (Session 6), Thursday 26 May 2022. CVDR/S6/22/15/1. In COVID-19 Recovery Committee 15th Meeting, 2022 Thursday, May 26, 2022 (pp. 1–15). The Scottish Parliament, https://www.parliament.scot/~/media/committ/3435#page=3.

Tump, A. N., Pleskac, T. J., Romanczuk, P., & Kurvers, R. H. J. M. (2022). How the cognitive mechanisms underlying fast choices influence information spread and response bias amplification in groups. In J. Culbertson, A. Perfors, H. Rabagliati, & V. Ramenzoni (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 658–664). UC Merced.

Appelhoff, S. (2022). Researching neural correlates of human decisions from experience using electroencephalography [PhD Thesis, Freie Universität Berlin]. https://doi.org/10.17169/refubium-35218

Rahwan, Z. (2022). Dishonesty: The role of rewards, professional identity and experimenter purpose disclosures [PhD Thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin].

Tiede, K. E. (2022). An ecological perspective on decisions under risk: How the structure of the environment shapes information processing [PhD Thesis, Universität Konstanz].

Billenstein, H. (2022). Morality at odds: Probability as a moral factor in sacrificial dilemmas [Master's Thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin].

Düben, M. (2022). 3-4-year-old children's behavior in binary repeated choice from description [Master's Thesis, Universität Potsdam].

Hebisch, J. (2022). Neural correlates for adolescent risk-taking in the learning context [Master's Thesis, Westfälische Wilhelms Universität Münster].

Kohler, M. (2022). #Drosten: Analyzing predictors of the spread of Covid-19 risk communication on Twitter [Master's Thesis, Universität Basel].

Mata, R., Richter, D., Josef, A., Frey, R., & Hertwig, R. (2022). SOEP-IS 2014 - Individual and age differences in decisions from description and experience (SOEP Survey Papers No. 1097). Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.

Holford, D., Fasce, A., Tapper, K., Demko, M., Lewandowsky, S., Hahn, U., Al-Rawi, A., Alladin, S., Boender, T. S., Bruns, H., Fischer, H., Gilde, C., Hanel, P. H. P., Herzog, S., Kause, A., Lehmann, S., Nurse, M. S., Orr, C., Pescetelli, N., Petrescu, M., Sah, S., Schmid, P., Sirota, M., & Wulf, M. (2022). A manifesto for science communication as collective intelligence. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TZUFW

Grüning, D. J., Panizza, F., & Lorenz-Spreen, P. (2022). The importance of informative interventions in a wicked environment [Review of the book Breaking the social media prism: How to make our platforms less polarizing by Chris Bail. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2021]. The American Journal of Psychology, 135(4), 439–442. https://doi.org/10.5406/19398298.135.4.12